🌙
Skip to main content

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE TARGETED: US-China Cyber Conflict Jumps to a New, Terrifying Level

  CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE TARGETED: US-China Cyber Conflict Jumps to a New, Terrifying Level Published: October 19, 2025 • CyberDudeBivash ThreatWire • cyberdudebivash.com • cyberbivash.blogspot.com • cyberdudebivash-news.blogspot.com • cryptobivash.code.blog 🔔 Subscribe on LinkedIn The power grid . The financial backbone. The antithesis of downtime. All now squarely in the crosshairs of US-China cyber escalation . Why trust CyberDudeBivash ? We analyse state-level cyber conflict for US/EU/UK/AU/IN orgs and translate geopolitical TTPs into actionable playbooks for enterprise SOC , DFIR & board-level briefing. TL;DR Escalation sign: China accuses the U.S. of cyber-attacks on its critical time-infrastructure (NTSC Xi’an), marking a shift from economic espionage to operational warfare . Why it matter...

Hackers Are Turning Linux's eBPF Engine Into an "Invisible" Rootkit


Published:
Hackers Are Turning Linux’s eBPF Engine Into an “Invisible” Rootkit
www.cyberdudebivash.com cyberdudebivash-news.blogspot.com cyberbivash.blogspot.com cryptobivash.code.blog
Linux Tux mascot representing Linux kernel and eBPF
Image: Tux the Linux mascot (Wikimedia Commons)
TL;DR: Attackers are abusing eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) to load stealthy kernel hooks that hide processes, sockets, and files, intercept credentials, and tamper with telemetry—without dropping a traditional kernel module. If eBPF loading isn’t locked down, a single privileged process can implant a near-invisible rootkit. Lock eBPF to signed policies, restrict CAP_BPF/CAP_SYS_ADMIN, enable LSMs (SELinux/AppArmor), and monitor /sys + pinned maps for anomalies.

What is eBPF, and why attackers love it

eBPF lets the OS run small, verified programs inside the kernel to observe and safely modify behavior—networking, syscalls, tracing, even security policy. It’s a defensive superpower (think modern XDP firewalls, observability, zero-copy telemetry) but, in hostile hands, the same hooks can cloak malware, block detection, and rewrite events before your EDR ever sees them.

Typical attack chain (real-world playbook)

  1. Initial foothold: weak SSH creds, vulnerable web app, or supply-chain script.
  2. Privilege escalation: kernel/driver bug, misconfig (sudo NOPASSWD), or container breakout.
  3. eBPF deployment: attacker loads BPF bytecode via bpf() syscalls; pins maps/programs under /sys/fs/bpf.
  4. Stealth hooks: kprobes/tracepoints uprobes to hide processes/ports, filter packets, and scrub logs.
  5. Persistence: services or cron that auto-re-pins programs at boot; masquerade as observability agents.

What an eBPF rootkit can do

  • Process & file hiding: Filtered directory reads and procfs queries.
  • Socket cloaking: Suppress specific ports from ss/netstat.
  • Credential theft: Hook read/write or TLS libraries via uprobes to skim secrets.
  • EDR blindspots: Tamper with audit/syscall events; drop packets before IDS sees them.
  • Resilience: Pinned maps/programs survive process death; re-attachment on restart.

Who is most at risk?

  • Kubernetes clusters with CNI plugins and observability stacks that already use eBPF.
  • DevOps/SRE boxes where CAP_SYS_ADMIN is common and signing/enforcement is lax.
  • Telco/edge and cloud gateways using XDP/TC for performance tuning.

Detection: how to spot an “invisible” eBPF implant

  • List loaded programs/maps:
    bpftool prog show
    bpftool map show
    ls -al /sys/fs/bpf
    mount | grep bpf   # unexpected mounts?
  • Look for suspicious pins (odd names, unexpected owners), non-root namespaces mounting BPF, or BPF objects owned by service accounts.
  • Audit BPF syscalls:
    auditctl -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S bpf -k bpf-load
    ausearch -k bpf-load
  • Correlate with process ancestry (who invoked bpf()?) and recent privilege escalations.

Hardening checklist (immediate actions)

  • Restrict capabilities: Drop CAP_BPF and CAP_SYS_ADMIN in containers and systemd services by default.
  • Enable LSM enforcement: SELinux enforcing or AppArmor profiles that block unapproved BPF loads.
  • Lock down BPF FS: Limit access to /sys/fs/bpf; disable unneeded BPF features on hardened hosts.
  • Signed eBPF programs only: Use a loader that verifies signatures; maintain an allow-list of approved BPF object hashes.
  • Kubernetes: PSP/OPA/Gatekeeper constraints to ban privileged pods and cap dangerous capabilities; review CNI/eBPF agents.
  • Monitoring: Ship regular bpftool inventories; alert on new pins, new mounts, or changes to BPF maps.

Incident response: if you suspect BPF-based stealth

  1. Isolate the node (cordon/drain in K8s, detach from load balancers).
  2. Snapshot BPF state:
    bpftool prog dump xlated id <ID>
    bpftool map dump id <ID>
  3. Unpin and detach unknown programs; reboot if hooks re-attach.
  4. Rotate credentials touched by the host; redeploy from trusted images.

Related on CyberDudeBivash

Get our fastest threat intel. Executive-ready briefs, detection rules, and patch priorities. Subscribe on LinkedIn →

Security Essentials (sponsored)

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy via these links. It helps keep our research free.

#Linux #eBPF #Rootkit #KernelSecurity #XDP #Syscall #Kubernetes #EDR #SOC #DFIR #DevSecOps #CloudSecurity #RedTeam #BlueTeam #ZeroTrust #US #UK #EU #Australia #India

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fal.Con 2025: Kubernetes Security Summit—Guarding the Cloud Frontier

  Introduction Cloud-native architectures are now the backbone of global services, and Kubernetes stands as the orchestration king. But with great power comes great risk—misconfigurations, container escapes, pod security, supply chain attacks. Fal.Con 2025 , happening this week, aims to bring together experts, security practitioners, developers, policy makers, and cloud providers around Kubernetes security, cloud protection, and threat intelligence . As always, this under CyberDudeBivash authority is your 10,000+ word roadmap: from what's being addressed at Fal.Con, the biggest challenges, tools, global benchmarks, and defense guidelines to stay ahead of attackers in the Kubernetes era.  What is Fal.Con? An annual summit focused on cloud-native and Kubernetes security , bringing together practitioners and vendors. Known for deep technical talks (runtime security, network policy, supply chain), hands-on workshops, and threat intel sharing. This year’s themes inc...

CVE-2025-5086 (Dassault DELMIA Apriso Deserialization Flaw) — Targeted by Ransomware Operators

  Executive Summary CyberDudeBivash Threat Intel is monitoring CVE-2025-5086 , a critical deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso (2020–2025). Rated CVSS 9.0 (Critical) , this flaw allows remote code execution (RCE) under certain conditions.  The vulnerability is already included in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog , with reports of ransomware affiliates exploiting it to deploy payloads in industrial control and manufacturing environments. Background: Why DELMIA Apriso Matters Dassault DELMIA Apriso is a manufacturing operations management (MOM) platform used globally in: Industrial control systems (ICS) Smart factories & supply chains Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) Because of its position in production and logistics workflows , compromise of Apriso can lead to: Disruption of production lines Data exfiltration of intellectual property (IP) Ransomware-enforced downtime V...

Gentlemen Ransomware: SMB Phishing, Advanced Evasion, and Global Impact — CyberDudeBivash Threat Analysis

  Executive Summary The Gentlemen Ransomware group has quickly evolved into one of the most dangerous cybercrime collectives in 2025. First spotted in August 2025 , the group has targeted victims across 17+ countries with a strong focus on SMBs (small- and medium-sized businesses) . Their attack chain starts with phishing lures and ends with full-scale ransomware deployment that cripples organizations. CyberDudeBivash assesses that Gentlemen Ransomware’s tactics—including the abuse of signed drivers, PsExec-based lateral movement, and domain admin escalation —make it a critical threat for SMBs that often lack robust cyber defenses. Attack Lifecycle 1. Initial Access via Phishing Crafted phishing emails impersonating vendors, payroll systems, and invoice alerts. Credential harvesting via fake Microsoft 365 login pages . Exploitation of exposed services with weak authentication. 2. Reconnaissance & Scanning Use of Advanced IP Scanner to map networks. ...
Powered by CyberDudeBivash