Skip to main content

ChatGPT Targeted: “ShadowLeak” Zero-Click Vulnerability in Deep Research Could Exfiltrate Gmail Data A Complete Cyber Threat Analysis Report — By CyberDudeBivash Author: CyberDudeBivash · Powered by: CyberDudeBivash

 


Executive summary

Researchers at Radware disclosed ShadowLeak, a zero-click indirect prompt-injection flaw in ChatGPT’s Deep Research agent that, when connected to Gmail (and browsing enabled), could exfiltrate inbox data via a single crafted email—with no user interaction and no visible UI cues. OpenAI confirmed and patched the issue before public disclosure (September 18–20, 2025). The attack is notable for being service-side: data leaves OpenAI’s cloud rather than the user’s device, making enterprise detection far harder. SecurityWeek+3radware.com+3radware.com+3

What is Deep Research and why it was exposed

Deep Research lets users delegate multi-step tasks to an agentic AI that can browse and access connected data sources (e.g., Gmail, Google Drive) to compile findings. The agent will read emails/attachments as part of its task plan. This connective power, combined with prompt-following, makes it high-impact if an attacker can plant hidden instructions the agent will read and obey. Malwarebytes

How ShadowLeak works (at a glance)

  • Vector: A legitimate-looking email carries hidden instructions (e.g., white-on-white text, tiny fonts, CSS-hidden blocks) that only the agent reads when scanning the inbox.

  • Exploit: The poisoned content induces the agent to extract sensitive Gmail data (threads, names, addresses, summaries) and exfiltrate it—e.g., by embedding data into a URL fetch or posting to attacker infra.

  • Zero-click & service-side: The user doesn’t open or click; the agent runs from OpenAI infrastructure, so local controls/EDR don’t see the leak. radware.com+2The Hacker News+2

Conditions required

  • The user has connected Gmail to ChatGPT (Deep Research/Connectors).

  • The agent is allowed to browse and process the Gmail inbox as part of its plan.

  • A crafted email lands in the mailbox (the attack can trigger during routine agent runs). radware.com

Impact & business risk

  • PII/PHI exposure (names, emails, deal/legal details).

  • Regulatory exposure (GDPR/CCPA/SEC), reputational harm, potential downstream fraud.

  • Detection gap: Because the leak occurs server-side, SOC tools watching endpoints/gateways might miss it. radware.com

Incident timeline (IST; September 2025)

  • Sep 18, 2025: Radware publishes ShadowLeak details and advisory; OpenAI confirms a fix. radware.com

  • Sep 19–20, 2025: Trade press & vendors report fix; no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation disclosed. SecurityWeek+2Malwarebytes+2

  • Sep 20–22, 2025: Wider coverage (EU/US outlets) reiterates zero-click, service-side nature. Cinco Días+1

Technical deep dive (concise)

  • Attack class: Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) via email HTML.

  • Execution flow: Deep Research → reads inbox → parses HTML → hidden prompt triggers goal re-write (“exfiltrate summary/headers/threads to URL X”).

  • Exfil path: Outbound requests from OpenAI servers (e.g., image loads/HTTP calls) carrying sensitive data in query strings/headers/body.

  • Defense challenge: Classic mail gateways don’t see agent-side behavior; endpoint EDR won’t see cloud egress. radware.com+1

Detection ideas (what blue teams can do now)

  1. Review ChatGPT account integrations: enumerate org users who enabled Gmail/Calendar connectors or Deep Research. Log when agents accessed email. SecurityWeek

  2. Look for unusual agent activity: alerts on bulk summaries or uncharacteristic data pulls from mailboxes (audit trails, OAuth access logs).

  3. Outbound anomaly hunting: if you run egress logging for AI connectors (SaaS CASB/SSE), search for high-entropy URL queries or calls to unknown domains shortly after agent runs.

  4. Retrospective check: correlate timestamps of Deep Research tasks with arrival of strange emails (e.g., invisible text, oversized HTML, excessive CSS). The Hacker News

Mitigations & hardening (prioritized)

Immediate (today):

  • Disable/limit Gmail access for agentic modes unless strictly required; enforce least-privilege scopes. radware.com

  • Quarantine “invisible-text” emails: raise scores for mails with white-on-white, zero-size fonts, offscreen CSS.

  • User controls: In Google settings, restrict Calendar/Email auto-ingestion to known senders; consider disconnecting connectors not in use. Tom's Hardware

  • Confirm OpenAI patch is active; monitor vendor bulletins for further mitigations. The Record from Recorded Future

Short term (this week):

  • Policy gates: Require human-in-the-loop approval before agents can read personal mailboxes or export content outside the tenant.

  • Output filtering: Block agent-initiated external fetches containing mailbox tokens/strings; sanitize URLs constructed by agents.

  • Prompt hardening: Add system prompts/guardrails that forbid data exfiltrations and penalize obeying hidden/invisible content. (Not bulletproof, but raises effort.) CSO Online

Longer term:

  • Model-side injections defense: deploy content provenance checks and HTML sanitization for agent inputs; maintain deny-lists for exfil patterns.

  • SaaS CASB/SSE with LLM/agent telemetry; require signed connector actions and per-action user consent for sensitive scopes.

  • Red-team scenarios: include zero-click IPI tests against connected data sources (Gmail/Drive/Calendar). WIRED

Frequently asked (fast answers)

  • Was this exploited in the wild? No public evidence so far; OpenAI fixed before widespread abuse was reported. Malwarebytes+1

  • Who’s affected? Users who connected Gmail and ran Deep Research with browsing; other connectors could be conceptually at risk. radware.com

  • Why didn’t our tools see it? The leak happened server-side from OpenAI, bypassing endpoint/network sensors. radware.com

CyberDudeBivash action checklist

  •  Inventory who enabled Gmail/Calendar connectors or Deep Research in your org. SecurityWeek

  •  Temporarily limit agent access to personal mailboxes; require approvals for mailbox reads. radware.com

  • Add mail-content detections for invisible/hidden text patterns.

  •  Block/inspect agent external fetches that embed mailbox data.

  •  Run a tabletop on zero-click IPI against AI connectors; brief execs on legal/compliance exposure. WIRED

Conclusion

ShadowLeak is a watershed: it shows how agentic AI + powerful connectors can be turned against users in zero-click, server-side ways traditional defenses won’t see. OpenAI’s fix reduces immediate risk, but organizations must treat AI connectors as high-risk integrations—with least-privilege scopes, human-in-the-loop controls, and new detections purpose-built for prompt-injection and service-side exfiltration. radware.com


Affiliate Toolbox (clearly disclosed)

Disclosure: If you buy via the links below, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. These items supplement (not replace) your security controls. This supports CyberDudeBivash in creating free cybersecurity content.

🌐 cyberdudebivash.com | cyberbivash.blogspot.com

#CyberDudeBivash #ShadowLeak #ChatGPT #DeepResearch #PromptInjection #ZeroClick #Gmail #AIAgents #CloudSecurity #ThreatIntel #Infosec

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CVE-2025-5086 (Dassault DELMIA Apriso Deserialization Flaw) — Targeted by Ransomware Operators

  Executive Summary CyberDudeBivash Threat Intel is monitoring CVE-2025-5086 , a critical deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso (2020–2025). Rated CVSS 9.0 (Critical) , this flaw allows remote code execution (RCE) under certain conditions.  The vulnerability is already included in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog , with reports of ransomware affiliates exploiting it to deploy payloads in industrial control and manufacturing environments. Background: Why DELMIA Apriso Matters Dassault DELMIA Apriso is a manufacturing operations management (MOM) platform used globally in: Industrial control systems (ICS) Smart factories & supply chains Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) Because of its position in production and logistics workflows , compromise of Apriso can lead to: Disruption of production lines Data exfiltration of intellectual property (IP) Ransomware-enforced downtime V...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fal.Con 2025: Kubernetes Security Summit—Guarding the Cloud Frontier

  Introduction Cloud-native architectures are now the backbone of global services, and Kubernetes stands as the orchestration king. But with great power comes great risk—misconfigurations, container escapes, pod security, supply chain attacks. Fal.Con 2025 , happening this week, aims to bring together experts, security practitioners, developers, policy makers, and cloud providers around Kubernetes security, cloud protection, and threat intelligence . As always, this under CyberDudeBivash authority is your 10,000+ word roadmap: from what's being addressed at Fal.Con, the biggest challenges, tools, global benchmarks, and defense guidelines to stay ahead of attackers in the Kubernetes era.  What is Fal.Con? An annual summit focused on cloud-native and Kubernetes security , bringing together practitioners and vendors. Known for deep technical talks (runtime security, network policy, supply chain), hands-on workshops, and threat intel sharing. This year’s themes inc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gentlemen Ransomware: SMB Phishing, Advanced Evasion, and Global Impact — CyberDudeBivash Threat Analysis

  Executive Summary The Gentlemen Ransomware group has quickly evolved into one of the most dangerous cybercrime collectives in 2025. First spotted in August 2025 , the group has targeted victims across 17+ countries with a strong focus on SMBs (small- and medium-sized businesses) . Their attack chain starts with phishing lures and ends with full-scale ransomware deployment that cripples organizations. CyberDudeBivash assesses that Gentlemen Ransomware’s tactics—including the abuse of signed drivers, PsExec-based lateral movement, and domain admin escalation —make it a critical threat for SMBs that often lack robust cyber defenses. Attack Lifecycle 1. Initial Access via Phishing Crafted phishing emails impersonating vendors, payroll systems, and invoice alerts. Credential harvesting via fake Microsoft 365 login pages . Exploitation of exposed services with weak authentication. 2. Reconnaissance & Scanning Use of Advanced IP Scanner to map networks. ...
Post a Comment
Read more