Skip to main content

Airport Check-in Systems Disrupted: Collins Aerospace Attack Throws European Airports Into Chaos A Threat Analysis Report — By CyberDudeBivash

 


Executive Summary

A cyberattack has hit Collins Aerospace (a U.S-based aviation/defense tech provider under RTX Corp.), crippling its Muse check-in and boarding software. This has disrupted electronic check-in, baggage drop, and boarding at several major European airports—Heathrow, Brussels, Berlin, Dublin—leading to delays, cancellations and forcing manual workarounds. This attack lays bare how reliant modern airports are on third-party systems and exposes serious risk in aviation supply chains. Reuters+2The Guardian+2

1. What we know so far

  • The impacted system is Muse, software by Collins Aerospace used at check-in desks, for boarding, printing bag tags & boarding passes. Reuters+2Financial Times+2

  • Electronic check-in & baggage drop services are disabled or impaired at affected airports. Self-service kiosks / online check-in remain functioning for many. AP News+2CBS News+2

  • Airports most affected: Brussels (heavy ongoing cancellations, many flights impacted), Berlin, Heathrow, Dublin (Terminal 2 mainly). Financial Times+3Reuters+3The Guardian+3

  • The company (RTX / Collins Aerospace) says the issue is “cyber-related disruption” and is working to deliver a secure version of the software. Reuters+1

  • Flight cancellations and delays will persist while the system is manually handled and the software patch is not delivered. Reuters+1

2. Threat Model & Likely Attack Vectors

Attack AspectSpeculation / Risk
Nature of the attackLikely malware, unauthorised code execution, or ransomware on Muse or supporting infrastructure. ENISA suggests third-party ransomware is behind the disruption. Reuters
Impacted componentsCheck-in desks, baggage drop systems, boarding passes printing; likely backend servers/management consoles for Muse. Not self-service kiosks in many cases. AP News+1
Broader supply-chain exposureSince Muse is used by multiple airlines/airports, compromised upstream vendor systems lead to cascading failures. Attack surface includes vendor-hosted software, network links, authentication, etc.
Potential actor motivationsCould be criminal extortion, disruption (political or hacktivist), or espionage. Attack yields high leverage: delay chaos, reputation damage, financial losses.

3. Consequences & Risks

  • Operational disruption: Delays, cancellations, passenger chaos, staff overload. Connected downstream impacts (crew scheduling, gates, baggage handling).

  • Financial losses: Airlines/airports lose revenue, incur service compensation, extra staffing & manual process costs.

  • Reputational damage: Customer trust erodes; regulatory scrutiny increases.

  • Security escalation risk: Manual or backup systems might lack usual security controls → potential for misuse, data leaks, fraud of boarding passes.

  • Cascading failures: If Muse not patched swiftly, more airports may be affected; delays propagate across networked flight schedules.

4. Detection & Mitigation Strategies

Detection Signals to Watch For

  • Unusual downtime or the inability of check-in desks to receive boarding pass / bag tag data.

  • Alerts or logs in Muse or related systems showing login failures, code anomalies, configuration changes.

  • External network connections from Muse servers being made to unknown hosts.

  • Changes to file integrity, signatures, or deployment artifacts for software used at check-in desks.

Mitigation & Emergency Response

  • Activate manual check-in & baggage drop procedures. Use backup systems.

  • Isolate affected systems from network to contain spread.

  • Bring in additional staff to handle passenger flow; extend check-in hours if necessary.

  • Communicate proactively with airlines and passengers; publish guidance on using self-service / online check-in.

  • Apply patches / hot-fixes as soon as vendor supplies secure version; verify integrity of updates.

5. Longer-Term Resilience Recommendations

  • Vendor audit & security posture: Demand stronger SLAs / cybersecurity standards from vendors. Ensure vendor infrastructure is hardened, regularly audited.

  • Redundancy & fallback systems: Airport systems should have redundancies (e.g., local/hybrid backup systems) that can switch over quickly.

  • Segmentation & least privilege: Apps like Muse should run in segregated networks; access control tight; separating critical infrastructure from general IT.

  • Incident readiness: Regular drills for cyberattack on critical systems; having communication plans; backup manual procedures.

  • Transparency & regulation: Regulators should define minimum cybersecurity requirements for aviation tech suppliers; oversight mechanisms for compliance.

6. Threat Level & Priority

  • Urgency: Very High — already active, major airports impacted, patch or mitigation delay has real cost.

  • Severity: Critical. Even though core aviation safety (air traffic control) is reportedly unaffected, passenger flow & airline operations are severely disrupted.

  • Scope: Large — multiple countries & major hubs; potential for broader spread if vendor systems not secured.

7. CyberDudeBivash Action Checklist

  •  Verify whether your airport or airline uses Collins Aerospace / Muse; check vendor bulletins for patches.

  •  Assess backup/manual check-in capabilities and train staff accordingly.

  •  Audit existing operational dependencies on third-party software; map critical points.

  •  Ensure that vendor systems are patched, access logs audited, and network segmentation in place.

  •  Monitor for data integrity issues in boarding / baggage systems.

  •  Engage regulators: ensure minimum cybersecurity criteria for vendors of critical airport tech.

Conclusion

This incident illustrates how a single vendor's software vulnerability can ripple across critical infrastructure when third-party dependencies are key to operations. The Collins Aerospace/Muse disruption is a warning: airports, airlines, and governments must push for stronger resilience, vendor accountability, and contingency planning. Without that, similar disruptions are not just possible—they're likely.


Affiliate Toolbox (clearly disclosed)

Disclosure: If you buy via the links below, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. These items supplement (not replace) your security controls. This supports CyberDudeBivash in creating free cybersecurity content.

🌐 cyberdudebivash.com | cyberbivash.blogspot.com

#CyberDudeBivash #CollinsAerospace #MuseSoftware #AirportSecurity #AviationCyber #Cyberattack #CriticalInfrastructure #FlightDelays #SupplyChainRisk #ThreatIntel

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CVE-2025-5086 (Dassault DELMIA Apriso Deserialization Flaw) — Targeted by Ransomware Operators

  Executive Summary CyberDudeBivash Threat Intel is monitoring CVE-2025-5086 , a critical deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso (2020–2025). Rated CVSS 9.0 (Critical) , this flaw allows remote code execution (RCE) under certain conditions.  The vulnerability is already included in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog , with reports of ransomware affiliates exploiting it to deploy payloads in industrial control and manufacturing environments. Background: Why DELMIA Apriso Matters Dassault DELMIA Apriso is a manufacturing operations management (MOM) platform used globally in: Industrial control systems (ICS) Smart factories & supply chains Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) Because of its position in production and logistics workflows , compromise of Apriso can lead to: Disruption of production lines Data exfiltration of intellectual property (IP) Ransomware-enforced downtime V...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fal.Con 2025: Kubernetes Security Summit—Guarding the Cloud Frontier

  Introduction Cloud-native architectures are now the backbone of global services, and Kubernetes stands as the orchestration king. But with great power comes great risk—misconfigurations, container escapes, pod security, supply chain attacks. Fal.Con 2025 , happening this week, aims to bring together experts, security practitioners, developers, policy makers, and cloud providers around Kubernetes security, cloud protection, and threat intelligence . As always, this under CyberDudeBivash authority is your 10,000+ word roadmap: from what's being addressed at Fal.Con, the biggest challenges, tools, global benchmarks, and defense guidelines to stay ahead of attackers in the Kubernetes era.  What is Fal.Con? An annual summit focused on cloud-native and Kubernetes security , bringing together practitioners and vendors. Known for deep technical talks (runtime security, network policy, supply chain), hands-on workshops, and threat intel sharing. This year’s themes inc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gentlemen Ransomware: SMB Phishing, Advanced Evasion, and Global Impact — CyberDudeBivash Threat Analysis

  Executive Summary The Gentlemen Ransomware group has quickly evolved into one of the most dangerous cybercrime collectives in 2025. First spotted in August 2025 , the group has targeted victims across 17+ countries with a strong focus on SMBs (small- and medium-sized businesses) . Their attack chain starts with phishing lures and ends with full-scale ransomware deployment that cripples organizations. CyberDudeBivash assesses that Gentlemen Ransomware’s tactics—including the abuse of signed drivers, PsExec-based lateral movement, and domain admin escalation —make it a critical threat for SMBs that often lack robust cyber defenses. Attack Lifecycle 1. Initial Access via Phishing Crafted phishing emails impersonating vendors, payroll systems, and invoice alerts. Credential harvesting via fake Microsoft 365 login pages . Exploitation of exposed services with weak authentication. 2. Reconnaissance & Scanning Use of Advanced IP Scanner to map networks. ...
Post a Comment
Read more